DARI ANGKA KE NORMA: PENALARAN NUMERIK MEMBENTUK PERTIMBANGAN MORAL DAN KEWARGAAN ANAK SD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37301/cerdas.v13i2.368Keywords:
Numeracy, moral reasoning, civic literacy, elementary education, citizenship educationAbstract
This study critically explores the urgency of integrating numerical reasoning into the development of moral judgment and civic awareness among elementary school students. Using a qualitative approach through comprehensive literature analysis, the research examines how numeracy skills interact with ethical decision-making processes and the internalization of civic values within the context of civic and citizenship education. The findings reveal that numeracy should not merely be understood as technical arithmetic skills but as a cognitive framework influencing children’s ability to weigh fairness, solidarity, and social responsibility. The integration of numeracy with moral reasoning enables students to evaluate alternatives more systematically, construct arguments supported by data, and reflect on the broader social implications of their decisions. Furthermore, the study highlights that embedding numeracy in civic education fosters critical thinking, data literacy, and reflective attitudes essential for nurturing democratic citizenship. The implications suggest a need for cross-disciplinary collaboration in curriculum design, ensuring that students not only master quantitative logic but also develop moral sensitivity and civic commitment. In this way, elementary education can play a pivotal role in shaping future generations who are numerically literate, ethically grounded, and socially responsible.
References
Anderson, R. C., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
Baroody, A. J. (2004). The development of adaptive expertise and flexibility: The integration of conceptual and procedural knowledge. In A. E. R. Glaser (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 1–32). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Case, R. (1998). A psychological model of moral reasoning. Developmental Review, 18(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1997.0450
Fischbein, E. (1999). Intuitions and schemata in mathematical reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1–3), 11–50. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003626224325
Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1–3), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003749919816
Hess, D. E. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kemendikbudristek. (2021). Profil Pelajar Pancasila. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Asesmen Nasional: Laporan hasil belajar numerasi dan literasi. Jakarta: Pusat Asesmen Pendidikan, Balitbang dan Perbukuan.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Nucci, L. P. (2001). Education in the moral domain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York, NY: Free Press.
Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Susanti, E., & Sutanto, A. (2020). Literasi numerasi dalam pembelajaran sekolah dasar: Tantangan dan strategi implementasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 5(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.24853/jpdn.5.2.101-115
Tilaar, H. A. R. (2012). Kebijakan pendidikan: Perspektif pembangunan manusia Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Trianto. (2010). Pengantar penelitian pendidikan bagi pengembangan profesi pendidikan dan tenaga kependidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Yusuf, M., & Arifin, Z. (2018). Pendidikan karakter berbasis Pancasila di sekolah dasar: Konsep dan implementasi. Jurnal Moral Kemasyarakatan, 3(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.21067/jmk.v3i1.2211
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copy right in each article belong to the authors.
1. The author acknowledges that the Journal Cerdas Proklamator as a publisher who publishes for the first time with the
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2. The Author can enter the writing separately, manage the non exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into the other versions (eg sent to the repository of the author's institution, publication in book, etc), by acknowledge that the manuscript was first published in the Jurnal Cerdas Proklamator.
